|
| Author |
Message |
adam
Joined: 17 Jan 2009 Posts: 8 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 5:16 pm Post subject: Compression - How much is too much? |
|
|
Hi guys and girls,
I've been a long time reader, but first time poster due to never having anything good enough to contribute, but I've got a question I can't seem to find an answer to and it's doing my head in.
First of all, I've got a 4AGE big port motor with 9.4:1 compression ratio. Everything is standard apart from TRD copy extractors and a pod filter.
I've recently blown my head gasket and while the head is off, I'm thinking of adding a thinner head gasket/shave a bit of the head for higher compression and doing some basic port and polishing.
What I'm stuck on is, how much can I shave off before it is too much for the standard ECU?
Installing a 0.5mm TRD head gasket to my current setup will give me roughly 10.1:1 compression ratio, will my motor run okay? How about going all out and shaving 60thou off the head and use the OEM head gasket? This will give me a compression ratio of about 11:1.
I'm planning on purchasing some 256 and 264 degree cams with about 8.35mm lift as well as a standalone ECU, but I'm just thinking, 'while the head is off, why not get myself some more compression?'
I will be running the car on 98 octane fuel at all times and am aware that I will need to purchase some adjustable cam gears to readjust the timing.
Sorry for the long post, but my question in short is, how high can I take the compression ratio before my standard ECU starts playing up on me?
Cheers
Adam
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jondee86 Takumi
Joined: 06 Apr 2007 Posts: 378 Location: New Zealand
1984 Toyota Corolla AE86 (early Levin)
|
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 3:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
The factory ECU doesn't know what compression you are running, so
it doesn't care Problem is that the fuel and igntion maps are not
optimised for the higher compression, so you can't really take advantage
of the potential. That will have to wait until you get your cams and new
management installed.
I believe that you need to be careful to avoid detonation at some high
load low rpm situations ?? Maybe someone who has done this can give
you an idea if it is a problem or not ?? I have a fully worked bigport
head sitting in the shed, and have been wondering if it would be worth
putting it on a bog stock bigport engine
Cheers... jondee86
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
oldeskewltoy Takumi
Joined: 29 Jan 2007 Posts: 478 Location: PDX, Oregon, USA
1987 Toyota Corolla AE86 (late US)
|
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 4:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm running 10.3 to 1 high comp pistons under a TVIS head and intake, and management system.
Toyota had a 4AGE (Singapore and some areas in Europe) without a catalyst, and so those engines had 10 to 1 originally from the assembly line
Your 10.1 to 1 will be a nice mover... will work with stock or mild cams. You might need a bit more fuel when you run a bit more cam. I recommend a 4.0 to 4.5 kilo flywheel to go along with that
Cutting the head, and or thinner gasket will require timing pulleys to correct cam timing.
_________________ Dan -
You can .... OR you can ask for help!!!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
adam
Joined: 17 Jan 2009 Posts: 8 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 5:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the replies guys.
Dan, it was actually your signature which made my decision to post this thread. And with your first sentence, you mentioned that you're running a TVIS head and intake, and management. Is that TVIS head's standard management system or an aftermarket? I think it's just the way I'm reading it, I'm not sure if you meant aftermarket or standard.
With the Singapore and some Europe countries running a 10:1 compression ratios, they would be running a different tuned ECU as well wouldn't they? Would it be possible for me to purchase one of their ECUs and run it here in Australia (as a cheaper temporary option)?
Also, I've read of a few people running their small port (10.3:1 comp ratio) motors with the 9.4:1 loom and ECU. They got it running fine, but I am unsure as to whether they were running it with any detonation problems, would anyone have any experience with this?

|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tolisspi Bunta
Joined: 24 Jan 2008 Posts: 859 Location: Greece-Korinthos
|
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 8:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
im running a 4ag(z)e with high compression piston, head blue top, adjustable cam gears with stock cams(i was running 272 10,5 but its another story). The ecu and harness is AT160 (JDM) with O2 and i have remove the catalyst. CR 11,5:1 (pistons info). Also i replace the fuel pump with bosch 044 and the whole system.
The car was running very good up to 5500rpm. Upper 5500rpm had problems with "ping" and the car wasnt running very good, lost power. But unfortunately i had electrical problem and i dont know if the ping was from the poor fuel (stock injector) or the electrical problems.
BAD BAD ENGLISH
_________________ **COROLLA EE80 - 4AGE 124HP**
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jondee86 Takumi
Joined: 06 Apr 2007 Posts: 378 Location: New Zealand
1984 Toyota Corolla AE86 (early Levin)
|
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 9:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Have a read here for a pretty lucid explanation of the factors involved
in getting the most out of increased compression...
http://www.popularhotrodding.com/tech/0311_phr_compression_ratio_tech/index.html
It's a little bit of a juggling act, but providing you don't go crazy, the
stock ECU should be fine. Racing engines run a lot closer to the edge.
Stock engines have a lot of latitude built-in to handle normal rebuilds
and carbon buildup etc.
Cheers... jondee86
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ZDoman Takumi
Joined: 20 Mar 2005 Posts: 263 Location: Hungary
|
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 1:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I used to do my engines around CR 11:1 if I removed the "joggles" inside the combustion chamber. Running on 98octane petrol. Without any problems by this time.
If you don't remove the joggles I think around 10,3-10,5 is the safe.
I always used to resurface the cyl head and the block top. Especially the block top used to have some small "rust" points, it used to be -0,1-0,2mm off the top to get it OK. With this I wasn't able to use thin metal headgasket on any of my engine (i tried 0,8mm) because the piston was knocking on the cyl head at the first engine start. So be careful!
I know an AW11 guy who has 12:1 CR with stock everything and he rallycross race the car. He told its not revving over 7000 but has a great torque I wouldn't try it, but it is working for a long time for him...maybe 99+ octane petrol, I don't know.

|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
adam
Joined: 17 Jan 2009 Posts: 8 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 1:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tolisspi: Thanks for your experiences. And your english is fine, I've seen much worse coming from those who have english as their first language.
jondee86: Cheers for the link. Definitely a good read, but will have to give it a few more reads for some of that information to sink in.
ZDoman: With your setup of 11:1 compression ratio, were you running this with the standard big port (9.4:1 CR) ECU?
I've begun work on de-shrouding the combustion chamber, still currently trying to get each chamber equal before polishing though.
12:1 CR running standard ECU is insane. hahaha
Edit: I forgot to mention that after a few hours of searching, I've come to the conclusion that big port ECUs powering a 10.3:1 CR motor is fine. Only bad thing people got was the motor running rich because small port motors have larger injectors.
Also, I will only be shaving/milling the head now due to modifications to the combustion chamber in the head. I just want my CR to be as close to a full number as possible. ie. 10.5:1 or 10.7:1, not 10.3348:1 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ZDoman Takumi
Joined: 20 Mar 2005 Posts: 263 Location: Hungary
|
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 2:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| adam wrote: |
ZDoman: With your setup of 11:1 compression ratio, were you running this with the standard big port (9.4:1 CR) ECU?
|
No, some of my engines were bigport EU-DM MAP and the others are smallport AFM and MAP aswell.
No one was bigport AFM (9,4:1) But I don't think this matters that much.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
adam
Joined: 17 Jan 2009 Posts: 8 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 2:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ZDoman wrote: |
No, some of my engines were bigport EU-DM MAP and the others are smallport AFM and MAP aswell.
No one was bigport AFM (9,4:1) But I don't think this matters that much. |
Sorry, but with your bigport EU-DM MAP motor, did this originally have the 9.4:1 CR or the 10:1? I'm not sure if Hungary run catalysts or not.
By the way, my motor is the MAP big port. 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tolisspi Bunta
Joined: 24 Jan 2008 Posts: 859 Location: Greece-Korinthos
|
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 3:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ZDoman wrote: | I always used to resurface the cyl head and the block top. Especially the block top used to have some small "rust" points, it used to be -0,1-0,2mm off the top to get it OK. With this I wasn't able to use thin metal headgasket on any of my engine (i tried 0,8mm) 1because the piston was knocking on the cyl head at the first engine start. So be careful!
I know an AW11 guy who has 12:1 CR with stock everything and he rallycross race the car. 2He told its not revving over 7000 but has a great torque I wouldn't try it, but it is working for a long time for him...maybe 99+ octane petrol, I don't know. |
1. How is the sound exactly? Every time you start the engine knocking? For 1-2 sec?
2.- Why not revving more that 7000rpm? Which is the problem?
About CR maybe is depending from the country and the car for example
Official Greek brochure for AE86 CR 9,4:1
Official French brochure for AE82 GT CR 10:1
and
Haynes service book(English edition) for AE82 GT 10:1
All the cars not cat.
 
_________________ **COROLLA EE80 - 4AGE 124HP**
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ZDoman Takumi
Joined: 20 Mar 2005 Posts: 263 Location: Hungary
|
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 5:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| adam wrote: |
Sorry, but with your bigport EU-DM MAP motor, did this originally have the 9.4:1 CR or the 10:1? I'm not sure if Hungary run catalysts or not.
By the way, my motor is the MAP big port.  |
They were 10:1 originally.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
oldeskewltoy Takumi
Joined: 29 Jan 2007 Posts: 478 Location: PDX, Oregon, USA
1987 Toyota Corolla AE86 (late US)
|
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 7:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
my engine in my black AE86 is a TVIS head and TVIS management. I'm using a 20V silvertop block, crank and rods, with 16V high comp pistons(10.3).
In essense this is a high comp short block with TVIS head and TVIS management. I am running larger injectors, Web's mildest cam upgrade, and AEM adjustable timing pulleys
I've been running this for about 6 years now...
_________________ Dan -
You can .... OR you can ask for help!!!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
adam
Joined: 17 Jan 2009 Posts: 8 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Sun Jul 05, 2009 6:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sweet, thanks for that guys.
I think I will shave my head to get about a 10.3:1 CR after I find the final volume in the combustion chamber.
Once I get a standalone system and cams installed, I might try to bump that compression up a little more with a thinner head gasket, but that won't be for a while.

|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
oldeskewltoy Takumi
Joined: 29 Jan 2007 Posts: 478 Location: PDX, Oregon, USA
1987 Toyota Corolla AE86 (late US)
|
Posted: Sun Jul 05, 2009 5:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm doing an extensive build on another engine right now.....
I found OEM chamber volume to be between 36 and 36.5 cc. When I was finished with the "joggle removal" (term used in TRD 4AG engine manual found in TRD Bible), the chambers were 37.5cc. Once the head was cut down the chambers were 33.5 cc. 33.5cc chambers, with the Euro/Singapore pistons(10 to 1), AND a STOCK head gasket(1.2mm), provide a finished compression ratio of 10.75 to 1.

_________________ Dan -
You can .... OR you can ask for help!!!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
XJS Wataru
Joined: 19 Mar 2005 Posts: 113 Location: Hungary
1986 Toyota Corolla AE86 (late EU)
|
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 10:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| jondee86 wrote: | The factory ECU doesn't know what compression you are running, so
it doesn't care Problem is that the fuel and igntion maps are not
optimised for the higher compression, so you can't really take advantage
of the potential. That will have to wait until you get your cams and new
management installed.
I believe that you need to be careful to avoid detonation at some high
load low rpm situations ?? Maybe someone who has done this can give
you an idea if it is a problem or not ?? I have a fully worked bigport
head sitting in the shed, and have been wondering if it would be worth
putting it on a bog stock bigport engine
Cheers... jondee86 |
The factory ECU does care. The main input for the ECU is some form of air measurement (pressure (MAP) or flow volume(AFM) ). If you pump up your compression ratio, the engine will consume more air, so the ECU will inject more petrol, simple is that. Of course there are limitations, but with moderate lift and timing there won't be any problem.
_________________ http://www.ae86.hu
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NoHachi Moderator
Joined: 07 Sep 2004 Posts: 2221 Location: Delft - The Netherlands
|
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 11:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| XJS wrote: | | If you pump up your compression ratio, the engine will consume more air, so the ECU will inject more petrol, simple is that. |
Ehm.. it doesn't consume more air at higher compression ratio's..its the exact same amount of air, compressed to a higher pressure.
Fueling stays exactly the same. Any problems will be on the ignition side of things and they will be difficult to detect without a decent knock-sensor.
_________________ A wheel to steer the front of the car
A pedal to steer the rear
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
XJS Wataru
Joined: 19 Mar 2005 Posts: 113 Location: Hungary
1986 Toyota Corolla AE86 (late EU)
|
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 11:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
| NoHachi wrote: | | XJS wrote: | | If you pump up your compression ratio, the engine will consume more air, so the ECU will inject more petrol, simple is that. |
Ehm.. it doesn't consume more air at higher compression ratio's..its the exact same amount of air, compressed to a higher pressure.
Fueling stays exactly the same. Any problems will be on the ignition side of things and they will be difficult to detect without a decent knock-sensor. |
Higher pressure itself doesn't give any more power, more air (and fuel) will. Hence the question: why the higher compression engines has more power, if they burn exactly the same amount of energy? Why all stronger engines has high compression ratio, some enabling the use of high-lift big overlap cams, if they will suck the same amount of air?
_________________ http://www.ae86.hu
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NoHachi Moderator
Joined: 07 Sep 2004 Posts: 2221 Location: Delft - The Netherlands
|
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 12:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Higher pressure allows for better efficiency. You get more energy from the same cylinder charge.
Search around on google, there will be plenty explanations. One example:
http://www.popularhotrodding.com/tech/0311_phr_...o_tech/index.html
_________________ A wheel to steer the front of the car
A pedal to steer the rear
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
XJS Wataru
Joined: 19 Mar 2005 Posts: 113 Location: Hungary
1986 Toyota Corolla AE86 (late EU)
|
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 12:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't want to deny any positive effects of the higher compression. I just said, higher compression will consume more air, and the ECU will compensate for it. Measure the air volume either case, measure the AFR accordingly, you will see the ecu trying to keep up.
But have a look from the other side: use slightly bigger cams, no shaving, no thin gasket, nothing. How the hell the ecu can compensate (up to a limit, of course) for the different than stock lift and duration, if it can't measure the air? Hence the question, what do you think what is the correlation of the static and dynamic compression?
_________________ http://www.ae86.hu
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NoHachi Moderator
Joined: 07 Sep 2004 Posts: 2221 Location: Delft - The Netherlands
|
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 12:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I understand what you said, but just disagree with you
Higher compression ratio's, all other things left stock, do not consume more air or fuel. The ECU does measure the amount of air going in,but it stays exactly the same.
If you read the link and some other references online, you will find decent (better then I can give for sure) explanations of why higher combustion pressures lead to a more efficient burn and more power.
All this is valid for a stock engine, with increased CR. Change anything else (affecting Volumetric-efficiency) and the amount of air changes.
_________________ A wheel to steer the front of the car
A pedal to steer the rear
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
XJS Wataru
Joined: 19 Mar 2005 Posts: 113 Location: Hungary
1986 Toyota Corolla AE86 (late EU)
|
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 12:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| NoHachi wrote: | I understand what you said, but just disagree with you
Higher compression ratio's, all other things left stock, do not consume more air or fuel. The ECU does measure the amount of air going in,but it stays exactly the same.
If you read the link and some other references online, you will find decent (better then I can give for sure) explanations of why higher combustion pressures lead to a more efficient burn and more power.
All this is valid for a stock engine, with increased CR. Change anything else (affecting Volumetric-efficiency) and the amount of air changes. |
Disagreement is good, generates agreement at the end.
So it's crystal clear now: you think change in CR doesn't effect on VE, I think it does. That's ok, everybody could have different opinions. 
_________________ http://www.ae86.hu
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NoHachi Moderator
Joined: 07 Sep 2004 Posts: 2221 Location: Delft - The Netherlands
|
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 1:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ah, ok, for arguments sake:
From Wikipedia:
| Quote: | | A high compression ratio is desirable because it allows an engine to extract more mechanical energy from a given mass of air-fuel mixture due to its higher thermal efficiency. High ratios place the available oxygen and fuel molecules into a reduced space along with the adiabatic heat of compression - causing better mixing and evaporation of the fuel droplets. Thus they allow increased power at the moment of ignition and the extraction of more useful work from that power by expanding the hot gas to a greater degree. |
_________________ A wheel to steer the front of the car
A pedal to steer the rear
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
XJS Wataru
Joined: 19 Mar 2005 Posts: 113 Location: Hungary
1986 Toyota Corolla AE86 (late EU)
|
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 1:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| NoHachi wrote: | Ah, ok, for arguments sake:
From Wikipedia:
| Quote: | | A high compression ratio is desirable because it allows an engine to extract more mechanical energy from a given mass of air-fuel mixture due to its higher thermal efficiency. High ratios place the available oxygen and fuel molecules into a reduced space along with the adiabatic heat of compression - causing better mixing and evaporation of the fuel droplets. Thus they allow increased power at the moment of ignition and the extraction of more useful work from that power by expanding the hot gas to a greater degree. |
|
I don't want to argue, you're right, more comression will generate more efficiency hence more power, I was wrong. Just search for me an other article where says higher compression doesn't consume more air.
_________________ http://www.ae86.hu
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mcm95403
Joined: 07 Jul 2009 Posts: 7 Location: San Mateo, CA USA
|
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 7:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
This is why I am switching over to 91 small port electronics. that way I have a block with a knock sensor and a computer designed to work with it. I think it will be a much better start for a hi-comp engine.
I think you'd be fine bumping the CR up by a full point with the stock ECU. If you want, I have a set of standard bore 10:3 hi-comp pistons and rods I was about to put on E-bay. You can e-mail me through my website if you'd like to buy just the pistons. If you can, get your hands on a small port intake and epoxy it up like this (assuming you're not in a RWD car - if so you also need to relocate the TB of course):
http://www.marcmedina.com/intake.html
It made a significant improvement. Also, the longer tube from a small port that goes between the TB and AFM (assuming you're not MAP equipped) was also a nice improvement. I didn't believe it either till I tried it.
_________________ Thanks,
Marc
www.marcmedina.com/MR2.html
www.marcmedina.com/6speed.html
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|