RoCo Performance AE86 V8

[ZaX]

improvedae86 Wrote:I was just sent this link and after reading it wondered if fia track/rally/hill sprints etc s series rear end AE86'S need to have roll centers way out from the body center of gravity ? Isn't the main design point of multi link to isolate the matching point regardless of body angle/roll angle? I am a bit unsure if at 3'c per 1'' if those cv boots are going to allow that angle to be run without bursting due to pressure/heat or locking also. S13 s series cv's dont have alot of flexability movement in rear width change/angle.

Speaking of angle's a angle grinder might have to be employed in cutting up whats left of that toyota to correct all of the above because no amount of bling chrome adjustable arms are going to cure a rear end placed maybe 20-30cm lower than in the standard s series car. All of this with a uz fitted too, with it's center of gravity up around the heads that rear end is never going to match that point. Meh forget the above and install a long arm jz series rear end wiht higher points or buy a fia soarer maybe. Was it really that hard to stick you head under a S13S14S15R32R33etc before starting ? really !@ there is no need to cut anything on a AE86 to fit it as per it's original design.

Since I am in process of doing similar thing on the rear end of my ae86 I was analyzing lot's of RoCo's pictures on the internet forums.
I have already pointed out the problem of roll center he will have on the driftworks forum, so it's up to him what to doo.
http://www.driftworks.com/forum/drift-ca...post938005

I have learned my lesson here so I did it, I think better, but let's leave it to my topic, as I already jumped in here once.